Website catalogue: 151 chains. Current AI connection: 14 chains; approved accounts only.

Layer 1 blockchain

DATA Network ticker DATA

  • No public-data lookups yet
  • 5 reviewed developments
  • 40 cited sources

Summary

Proof of stake with CometBFT voting. Since the Seneca hard fork (story v1.8.0, released in May 2026) took effect at mainnet block 18,173,000 on 2 June 2026, only the 21 validators with the most stake are active; the set was 64 at launch and 80 after the Polybius upgrade. A block is final once validators holding more than two-thirds of voting power precommit it. Stake is denominated in DATA, the gas token of the execution side: holders stake through a system contract whose events the consensus client processes, the consensus client then tracks the stake, and unbonded stake and rewards return to the execution side through per-block withdrawal queues. The staking design lists slashing of 5% plus permanent removal for double-signing, and 0.02% plus jailing for missing 95% of the last 28,800 blocks. Locked tokens can be staked with the same voting power but a reduced reward weight. 47161820242533

Design

System
Layer 1 blockchainIndependent proof-of-stake layer 1 (mainnet chain ID 1514) that ran as Story from its first mainnet client releases in January 2025 until its foundation renamed it DATA Network, and the IP token DATA, on 25 June 2026; the foundation said the network kept running without interruption and the validator set was unchanged. Every node runs two clients: story-geth, a fork of Geth that runs the EVM and holds balances, and story, a consensus client built on CometBFT and a PIP Labs fork of the Cosmos SDK that drives story-geth over the Engine API. It does not settle to another chain.
Settlement family
Ethereum / EVM
Scarce resource
Stake (proof of stake)
State model
Accounts
Finality
Economic finality
Who makes blocks
The active set is the top 21 validators by stake. CometBFT picks each round's proposer deterministically, in proportion to voting power. Creating a validator needs a self-stake of at least 1,024 tokens (the docs still write IP), a commission of at least 5%, and a one-time choice between accepting locked or unlocked tokens. Replies to the SIP-00011 proposal on the forum raised concentration concerns and mention Foundation delegations; the operators behind the 21 active validators and their stake shares were not verified.
Fork choice
No open weight-based chain selection. Each height is decided in CometBFT rounds of prevotes and precommits and commits with more than two-thirds of voting power; if a round fails, a new round starts at the same height. The execution client follows whatever the consensus client finalizes, through the Engine API fork-choice update. With more than one-third of voting power offline or refusing to sign, the chain stops. The Foundation's patch notes describe bugs, fixed in late 2025, that let a single malicious validator crash other nodes.

Qualifications

Tradeoffs

This view follows one way of thinking about design priorities, often called the blockchain trilemma. The design-priorities lesson sets out the counter-view. Read the design-priorities lesson.

Emphasizes
Scalability and Security
Gives up
Breadth of block production. Since June 2026 at most 21 validators, ranked by stake, propose and commit every block, down from 80, and Foundation delegations influence who is in the set. Software upgrades are scheduled by hard forks or through an upgrade contract that the node docs describe as multisig-controlled, and a Security Council that Foundation directors largely appoint in its first phase can veto upgrades and pause contracts in emergencies.The Foundation presents one-block finality and the smaller set as performance choices; SIP-00011 argues that fewer validators cut consensus messaging. Security is listed because committed blocks do not reorganize while fewer than one-third of voting power misbehaves and the documented slashing puts stake at risk, but the slashing figures come from documentation and were not checked against on-chain parameters, and several liveness bugs were patched through private binaries before disclosure.
Full node at home
Demanding 1011122022The mainnet node guide lists a dedicated 8-core CPU, 32 GB of RAM, a 500 GB NVMe drive and 25 Mbit/s on Ubuntu 22.04, with two clients running side by side. The consensus client supports snap sync for the execution client, and the validator guide points operators recovering from upgrades to snapshots they make themselves or get from community providers, which means trusting that snapshot. Since story-geth v1.2.0 a path-based archive node keeps 90,000 blocks of historical state by default. Current chain size was not stated. Joining the 21-validator active set is a separate, stake-ranked step.
Throughput claims
No classified figure recorded

Scaling layers

No scaling layer recorded in this profile.

Capabilities

Capabilities of DATA Network: how each one is provided, or its research status
CapabilityHow it is providedNotes and sources
Account abstractionStructured assessment pendingNot yet assessed for any chain.
Atomic swapsUnknownNo hash-time-locked or other trust-minimized swap mechanism for this chain was reviewed. The EVM could host one, but none was verified.
Authenticated data publicationCore-team softwareLimited scopeCore metadata module (Proof-of-Creativity contracts, published by the DATA Foundation and deployed on mainnet): an IP asset's owner records a metadata URI and a 32-byte hash of that file on chain and in an event; readers fetch the file and check the hash, and changes emit new events until the owner freezes them. Limited: only the URI and hash are on chain, so retrieval depends on the file's host; the contract does not check the hash; the contracts are deprecated from 19 September 2026. Trace was not assessed: its guide shows no way for a reader to check a record against an on-chain commitment. 14262728
Light clientsBuilt into the protocolLimited scopeCometBFT commits: consensus produces what a light client checks, since each block is committed with precommit signatures from validators holding more than two-thirds of voting power, and each consensus block carries the execution payload. Limited: no mainnet light client or cross-chain light-client connection for this chain was found; the whitepaper says the enclave software behind Confidential Data Rails runs a light client that checks block headers and signatures, but that software runs only on the Aeneid testnet. 6891516
Native staking or delegationStructured assessment pendingNot yet assessed for any chain.
On-chain governanceStructured assessment pendingNot yet assessed for any chain.
Parallel executionStructured assessment pendingNot yet assessed for any chain.
Payment or state channelsUnknownNo payment or state channel network settling to this chain was reviewed.
Programmable spendingNative (protocol or core-team software) Earlier definitionstory-geth runs the EVM with the Pectra features, including delegated account code for ordinary accounts (EIP-7702), enabled on mainnet in 2025, and the Fusaka changes activated on 15 January 2026; spend conditions are smart contracts and smart accounts. 51222
Protocol-verified messagingStructured assessment pendingNot yet assessed for any chain.
Reversible transfers or recoveryUnknownNo protocol feature for cancelling, delaying or reclaiming a payment, or for account recovery, was found in the reviewed docs, and absence was not verified. The Security Council's emergency powers to pause contracts and, with governance, restore funds are interventions, not a path a user sets up. 13
RollupsUnknownNo rollup settling to this chain was reviewed.
Shielded transfersStructured assessment pendingNot yet assessed for any chain.
Signed partial offersUnknownNo mechanism for this chain by which a maker signs one side of a trade that any taker can complete in one transaction was reviewed.
Reading these values
How this feature is provided
Built into the protocol, core-team software or independent software says where a feature lives and who can change it. These are implementation layers, not quality: core-team software is not closer to the protocol than independent software.
Structured assessment pending
The shared review has not assessed this feature for any chain yet (Account abstraction, Native staking or delegation, On-chain governance, Parallel execution, Protocol-verified messaging and Shielded transfers). That does not mean it is absent, and a chain’s profile may already describe it.
Unknown
The review has not established this for this chain under the current definition; the note beside it says why. Unknown is not absent and not a low score. A feature reads “Not present” only when a source shows it is absent.
Earlier definition
Payment or state channels, Programmable spending and Rollups keep the earlier definition until the next fact-check. There, “Native” does not separate the protocol from core-team software, “Ecosystem software” does not say who publishes it, and “Partial” does not say which layer.
Reading across rows
The list of capabilities is incomplete. Do not read these rows as a chain leading or lagging overall.

Definitions, schema version and review history

Ecosystem & custody

Ecosystem products for DATA Network
Product typeStatusNotes and sources
Automated market makersThinStoryHunt, PiperXStoryHunt's app describes it as an AMM DEX native to the chain, and PiperX's site lists an AMM DEX with farming and voting, powered by Story; DeFiLlama lists both on the chain with small amounts locked. Operators, audits and liquidity depth were not reviewed, and other venues were not sampled. 313234 As of Sep 29, 2026.
Issuer-native stablecoinsNone foundThe Foundation's FAQ says the chain has no native stablecoin and points to USDC.e bridged through Stargate; neither Circle's USDC contract list nor Tether's supported-protocol list includes the chain. 23536 As of Sep 29, 2026.
Algorithmic stablecoinsUnknownNo algorithmic stablecoin with material use on this chain was reviewed. As of Sep 29, 2026.
BridgesEstablished in the ecosystemStargate (USDC.e route), deBridge, Orbiter FinanceThe Foundation's docs point users to three independent bridges and name Stargate as the route for bridged USDC.e; DeFiLlama also lists LayerZero on the chain. No bridge run by the Foundation or verified by this chain's own validators was found. Risk: Each bridge is run by a separate company with its own trust model (verifiers, relayers or liquidity providers), which this review did not audit. USDC.e is a bridged token, not USDC issued by Circle on this chain, so it is only as sound as the bridge that minted it. 1234 As of Sep 29, 2026.
Block explorersThinDATA Network Blockscout explorer (datanetscan.io)The Foundation's mainnet page lists one official explorer, the Blockscout instance at datanetscan.io, without naming who runs it; the older storyscan.io address redirected there on 2026-09-29. The page also lists five community explorers (Stakeme, Nodes.Guru, CroutonDigital, DeSpread and Noders); in a spot check on 2026-09-29 only the Nodes.Guru page loaded, its data was not checked, and the other four returned errors or did not answer, so one explorer is counted. Explorer data is indexed and can lag the chain. 330 As of Sep 29, 2026.
Hardware walletsThinLedger (listed as Story, ticker IP, behind a feature switch), Trezor (through MetaMask or Rabby)See custody rows: Ledger's currency list includes the network as Story with ticker IP, signed with the Ethereum app, but Ledger Wallet's code keeps it behind a feature switch that is off by default. Trezor's Data Network page lists the network only beside MetaMask and Rabby, not Trezor Suite. The chain's docs recommend software EVM wallets without naming a hardware wallet. 137383940 As of Sep 29, 2026.

Hardware-wallet custody

Hardware-wallet custody for DATA Network
Device makerStatusWhat users can and cannot do
LedgerPartialSame as native: UnknownCan: Use the Story account type in Ledger Wallet where Ledger has switched it on; the currency entry for chain ID 1514 signs with the Ledger Ethereum app
Cannot: Count on Ledger Wallet showing the network by default: its code declares the Story currency switch with a default of off, and whether Ledger turns it on remotely was not verified
Cannot: Find the network under its current name: Ledger's currency list (@ledgerhq/cryptoassets 13.56.0) still calls it Story with ticker IPLedger's currency entry names the network Story, ticker IP, 18-decimal units, chain ID 1514 and an explorer at storyscan.io, so it predates the June 2026 rename. 373839 As of Sep 29, 2026.
TrezorThrough an intermediaryMetaMask or Rabby (third-party wallet apps)Same as native: UnknownCan: Use a Trezor Safe 3, Safe 5 or Safe 7 with the network through MetaMask or Rabby, which Trezor's Data Network page lists
Cannot: Count on Trezor Suite for the network: Trezor's page names only MetaMask and Rabby as the wallet apps for itTrezor's page uses the new name, Data Network, and lists the supported network as Story; Trezor Suite's own code was not checked. Signing staking-contract calls with a Trezor was not tested. 40 As of Sep 29, 2026.

Public data

iKnow Blockchain has no public-data lookups for DATA Network yet. This is a limit of the service, not a statement about the network.

Public-data lookups for DATA Network
LookupStatusWhat it covers and its limits
Address or accountNot available yetPublic-data lookups for this chain are not built yet.
Tokens and assetsNot available yetPublic-data lookups for this chain are not built yet.
NFTsNot available yetPublic-data lookups for this chain are not built yet.
TransactionsNot available yetPublic-data lookups for this chain are not built yet.

A lookup covers one address or transaction from one provider. It is never a complete wallet, and an error or private value is reported as unknown, not zero. About public data · Connect your AI

Sourced developments

Developments: Reviewed Sep 29, 2026 Next review due Oct 9, 2026, 12:00 UTC.

Publication date · newest first

Topics your AI can explain

Your AI can explain these topics for DATA Network through the connection, with sources.

Known gaps

What this profile's review did not establish:

Sources

Oldest dated source check: Source checked Sep 29, 2026 Next check due Oct 29, 2026.

All 40 sources were checked in the last 30 days.

  1. Introduction (external site)DATA Foundation Docs · retrieved
  2. FAQ (external site)DATA Foundation Docs · retrieved
  3. Mainnet: network resources, RPC and block explorers (external site)DATA Foundation Docs · retrieved
  4. Staking Design (external site)DATA Foundation Docs · retrieved
  5. Execution Layer (EL) (external site)DATA Foundation Docs · retrieved
  6. Consensus Layer (CL) (external site)DATA Foundation Docs · retrieved
  7. Engine API (external site)DATA Foundation Docs · retrieved
  8. Cosmos modules overview (external site)DATA Foundation Docs · retrieved
  9. EVM engine module (external site)DATA Foundation Docs · retrieved
  10. Full Node (mainnet setup guide) (external site)DATA Foundation Docs · retrieved
  11. Become a Validator: overview (external site)DATA Foundation Docs · retrieved
  12. Release Notes (external site)DATA Foundation Docs · retrieved
  13. Security Council (external site)DATA Foundation Docs · retrieved
  14. Trace Integration Guide (external site)DATA Foundation Docs · retrieved
  15. CDR Overview (external site)DATA Foundation Docs · retrieved
  16. The DATA Network, Version 0.2 (June 2026) (external site)The Data Foundation · retrieved
  17. We're becoming The DATA Foundation (external site)The Data Foundation blog · retrieved
  18. Recent Network Patches (external site)The Data Foundation blog · retrieved
  19. How Story Secures its Governance Processes (external site)The Data Foundation blog · retrieved
  20. Seneca (Story v1.8.0) release notes (external site)PIP Labs (GitHub, piplabs/story) · retrieved
  21. piplabs/story go.mod (main branch): CometBFT and Cosmos SDK fork dependencies (external site)PIP Labs (GitHub) · retrieved
  22. Yasunari (Story-Geth v1.2.0) release notes: Fusaka upgrade (external site)PIP Labs (GitHub, piplabs/story-geth) · retrieved
  23. core/vm/ipgraph.go: IP Graph precompile (main branch) (external site)PIP Labs (GitHub, piplabs/story-geth) · retrieved
  24. [Proposal] SIP-00011: Reducing the Active Validator Set from 80 to 21 (external site)DATA Foundation forum · retrieved
  25. CometBFT specification: Proposer Selection Procedure (external site)CometBFT (GitHub) · retrieved
  26. protocol-core-v1: Story Proof-of-Creativity Core (README with deprecation notice) (external site)The Data Foundation (GitHub) · retrieved
  27. contracts/modules/metadata/CoreMetadataModule.sol (external site)The Data Foundation (GitHub) · retrieved
  28. deploy-out/deployment-1514.json: mainnet contract addresses (external site)The Data Foundation (GitHub) · retrieved
  29. WDATA: Wrapped DATA token repository (external site)PIP Labs (GitHub) · retrieved
  30. DATA Network blockchain explorer (Blockscout) (external site)Datanetscan · retrieved
  31. StoryHunt app (external site)StoryHunt · retrieved
  32. PiperX: DEX and liquidity layer (external site)PiperX · retrieved
  33. Block 18,173,000 (Seneca upgrade height) in the official explorer's API (external site)Datanetscan · retrieved
  34. DeFiLlama protocols API (entries listing the Story chain) (external site)DeFiLlama · retrieved
  35. USDC contract addresses (external site)Circle · retrieved
  36. Supported protocols (external site)Tether · retrieved
  37. @ledgerhq/cryptoassets 13.56.0 currency list (Story entry) (external site)Ledger (npm package via jsDelivr) · retrieved
  38. ledger-live: currencyStory feature flag definition (external site)Ledger (GitHub, LedgerHQ/ledger-live) · retrieved
  39. ledger-live: feature flag defaults (flag() defaults to disabled) (external site)Ledger (GitHub, LedgerHQ/ledger-live) · retrieved
  40. Data Network wallet (supported network: Story) (external site)Trezor · retrieved

Report an error

Found something wrong or out of date? Reporting is free, and every chain goes through the same process. Published corrections appear in the public log.

Funding disclosure

Funding disclosures appear here when an upkeep arrangement exists, in the form “Upkeep funded by [name]; verdicts unaffected.” The funder ledger has not been published yet. Neutrality & funding