Website catalogue: 151 chains. Current AI connection: 14 chains; approved accounts only.

Layer 1 blockchain

Sonic ticker S

  • No public-data lookups yet
  • 5 reviewed developments
  • 40 cited sources

Summary

Proof of stake with a leaderless, DAG-based asynchronous Byzantine fault tolerant consensus that Sonic's docs describe as a continuation of Lachesis, the design Fantom Opera also used. Each validator batches transactions into event blocks that reference other validators' events, building a directed acyclic graph. An event that builds on root events from validators holding more than two-thirds of stake in the previous frame becomes a new root; Sonic's docs describe this loosely as most validators having received and agreed on it. Decided roots fix a deterministic order of events, which is cut into ordinary blocks and executed by an EVM. Sonic's docs put submission-to-inclusion at about 1 to 2 seconds and elsewhere claim sub-second finality. 12917182223

Design

System
Layer 1 blockchainDescribes Sonic (chain ID 146, token S), launched by Sonic Labs on 18 December 2024 as the successor to Fantom Opera (chain ID 250, token FTM); the slug stays fantom for continuity. Sonic is a new chain with its own history, and FTM upgrades to S one for one. Opera is legacy: a 30 June 2026 retirement was postponed on 23 June 2026 until at least the end of 2026. Sonic is unrelated to the separately profiled Sonic SVM.
Settlement family
Ethereum / EVM
Scarce resource
Stake (proof of stake)
State model
Accounts
Finality
Other
Who makes blocks
Validators registered in the staking contract with at least 500,000 S of self-stake; a validator's total stake, including delegations, may be at most 16 times its self-stake. Registration is a direct contract call with no approval step documented. Every validator emits events concurrently rather than taking turns as a single proposer. Validators offline for more than about 5 days can be suspended. The number of active validators and the total staked were not confirmed from a published source.
Fork choice
There is no heaviest-chain rule. Nodes derive the same final order from the shared event graph once roots are decided. Fantom's Lachesis design notes state that every confirmed transaction is final unless more than one-third of validator weight is Byzantine, and Sonic's docs claim zero risk of rollbacks or reorganizations. The published staking contract marks a validator caught double-signing as a cheater and burns its stake, and its delegators' stake, on withdrawal, except for a refund share the contract owner may set for that validator.

Qualifications

Tradeoffs

This view follows one way of thinking about design priorities, often called the blockchain trilemma. The design-priorities lesson sets out the counter-view. Read the design-priorities lesson.

Emphasizes
Scalability and Security Contested
Gives up
Operational decentralization. A validator needs 500,000 S of self-stake, at least 32 GB of RAM, local NVMe or SSD storage and 1 Gbps redundant connectivity. A single owner address can change the staking contract's constants and set slashing refunds, the Gateway bridge has multisig-held admin roles, and one company, Sonic Labs, steers client releases, fee policy and token issuance. The size of the active validator set was not confirmed from a published source.Security here means deterministic finality with no reorganizations while fewer than one-third of staked weight is faulty, not a large or widely spread validator set. The staking contract's owner can refund slashed stake, so what a misbehaving validator stands to lose is discretionary, and the security reading is marked contested. Headline throughput figures in Sonic's materials come without a published method and are recorded only as unclassified claims.
Full node at home
Demanding 3910Sonic's docs list for an archive node at least 4 vCPU and 32 GB of RAM (8 vCPU and 64 GB recommended, 128 GB for high-demand use) and about 3 TB of free local SSD; a validator needs at least 4 vCPU, 32 GB of RAM, 1 TB of local SSD or NVMe and 1 Gbps redundant backbone connectivity, and the docs advise against remote block storage. Live pruning lets validators keep only current state without going offline. No separate specification for a non-archive, non-validator node was found.
Throughput claims
  • Unclassified: 400,000 tx/s 1Unclassified; do not compare.Sonic's docs state this figure with no method, time window, hardware, transaction type or network size, so it cannot be classed as a benchmark or an observed rate. It is a headline claim and says nothing about propagation limits, state growth or load made of padding transactions. It is 40 times the figure in Sonic's own mainnet launch post, which shows these claims are not comparable with each other or with other chains.
  • Unclassified: 10,000 tx/s 24Unclassified; do not compare.Stated in the mainnet launch post of 18 December 2024The launch post calls the figure verifiable but gives no benchmark conditions, hardware, transaction mix or whether it was measured on a test network or mainnet. No reproducible benchmark was found for this review, and it is not an observed mainnet rate.
Headline figures are not comparable across chains. A theoretical peak is never a like-for-like number.

Scaling layers

No scaling layer recorded in this profile.

Capabilities

Capabilities of Sonic: how each one is provided, or its research status
CapabilityHow it is providedNotes and sources
Account abstractionStructured assessment pendingNot yet assessed for any chain.
Atomic swapsUnknownNot yet assessed under the current definitions; mainnet activation of transaction bundles is not settled. Bundles (Brio upgrade, client version 2.2) let two parties each sign their own payment into one all-or-nothing plan on Sonic, so both land or neither does, and each signed transaction commits to the plan's hash. Sonic Labs scheduled Brio for 22 September 2026 and a news report says it went live that day, but the client changelog records only client support, and Sonic's network parameters page still listed Brio as disabled. Cross-chain hash-locked swaps were not reviewed. 6162128
Authenticated data publicationUnknownNot yet assessed under this row's current definition.
Light clientsUnknownNo light-client protocol or production light client for Sonic was found in the docs reviewed.
Native staking or delegationStructured assessment pendingNot yet assessed for any chain.
On-chain governanceStructured assessment pendingNot yet assessed for any chain.
Parallel executionStructured assessment pendingNot yet assessed for any chain.
Payment or state channelsUnknownNo payment or state channel network settling to Sonic was reviewed.
Programmable spendingNative (protocol or core-team software) Earlier definitionSonic runs the EVM with Solidity and Vyper contracts and supports account delegation to contract code for ordinary accounts (EIP-7702). Spend conditions are smart contracts and smart accounts. 45
Protocol-verified messagingStructured assessment pendingNot yet assessed for any chain.
Reversible transfers or recoveryUnknownNot yet assessed under the current definitions; Sonic's wallet page lists Safe among its institutional wallets, and its account abstraction page describes smart-contract accounts with customizable authorization rules and delegation of ordinary accounts to contract code (EIP-7702), but no delay or recovery module on Sonic was verified, and the guardian key-replacement standard that page mentions is only a proposal. The Sonic Gateway's 14-day fail-safe recovers bridge deposits after an outage; it is not a sender reversal or an account recovery path. 51213
RollupsUnknownNo rollup settling to Sonic was reviewed. Sonic SVM, a separately profiled project with a similar name, is not a rollup on this chain.
Shielded transfersStructured assessment pendingNot yet assessed for any chain.
Signed partial offersUnknownNot yet assessed under this row's current definition.
Reading these values
How this feature is provided
Built into the protocol, core-team software or independent software says where a feature lives and who can change it. These are implementation layers, not quality: core-team software is not closer to the protocol than independent software.
Structured assessment pending
The shared review has not assessed this feature for any chain yet (Account abstraction, Native staking or delegation, On-chain governance, Parallel execution, Protocol-verified messaging and Shielded transfers). That does not mean it is absent, and a chain’s profile may already describe it.
Unknown
The review has not established this for this chain under the current definition; the note beside it says why. Unknown is not absent and not a low score. A feature reads “Not present” only when a source shows it is absent.
Earlier definition
Payment or state channels, Programmable spending and Rollups keep the earlier definition until the next fact-check. There, “Native” does not separate the protocol from core-team software, “Ecosystem software” does not say who publishes it, and “Partial” does not say which layer.
Reading across rows
The list of capabilities is incomplete. Do not read these rows as a chain leading or lagging overall.

Definitions, schema version and review history

Ecosystem & custody

Ecosystem products for Sonic
Product typeStatusNotes and sources
Automated market makersEstablished in the ecosystemBeets (uses Balancer technology), Shadow ExchangeBeets' docs call it the flagship hub for AMM and liquid staking on Sonic and include a section on the Balancer technology it uses. Shadow's GitHub organization describes a Sonic-native concentrated-liquidity exchange with its core contracts for Sonic mainnet. Liquidity depth and current activity were not measured, and other venues were not reviewed. 3334 As of Sep 27, 2026.
Issuer-native stablecoinsEstablished in the ecosystemUSDC (Circle), USSD (Sonic Labs, built on Frax infrastructure)Circle lists a native USDC contract on Sonic and supports Sonic in its cross-chain transfer protocol. USSD, launched by Sonic Labs on 9 March 2026, is Frax's frxUSD offered under a Sonic name; Sonic says it is backed one for one by short-dated US dollar assets such as tokenized Treasury funds. USSD is Sonic Labs' own product, not part of the protocol. Reserve attestations were not reviewed. 1528293132 As of Sep 27, 2026.
Algorithmic stablecoinsUnknownAlgorithmic or hybrid stablecoins on Sonic were not reviewed. USSD and USDC are described by their issuers as asset-backed. As of Sep 27, 2026.
BridgesFirst-partySonic Gateway (Ethereum), Circle CCTP (USDC)Sonic Labs' Sonic Gateway moves tokens between Ethereum and Sonic in batches: about every 10 minutes from Ethereum and hourly back, with a paid fast lane, and it uses Circle's transfer protocol for USDC. Circle lists Sonic as a supported chain. FTM holders on Opera upgrade to S through Sonic's upgrade portal, and FTM on Ethereum through the Gateway. Third-party bridges were not reviewed. Risk: Gateway transfers depend on validators posting Merkle roots through an off-chain relay. OpenZeppelin's audit (September to October 2024) found no critical issues, one high (resolved) and three medium (two unresolved in the report). It notes multisig-held admin roles: a compromised top admin could grant a role able to withdraw all deposited funds. The fail-safe lets users recover deposits on Ethereum only after the Gateway or Sonic is down for 14 consecutive days. The USDC route relies on Circle's attestation service. 1225273032 As of Sep 27, 2026.
Block explorersEstablished in the ecosystemSonicScan (Etherscan), Sonic Explorer (explorer.soniclabs.com)SonicScan, built by Etherscan, showed recent Sonic blocks when fetched on 27 September 2026 and is the explorer named in Sonic's docs, which also list Arkham. The community chain registry also lists Sonic Labs' own explorer, whose content could not be read. Explorer data is provider-indexed, not consensus. 143536 As of Sep 27, 2026.
Hardware walletsThinLedger (Ledger Wallet support behind a feature switch), Trezor (through MetaMask or Rabby)See custody rows: Ledger's wallet code has a Sonic network behind a feature switch that is off by default, and no readable Ledger page confirms it is available to all users; Trezor's Sonic page says Trezor Suite does not support Sonic and names MetaMask and Rabby. Sonic's wallet page lists software and institutional wallets but no hardware vendor. 1337383940 As of Sep 27, 2026.

Hardware-wallet custody

Hardware-wallet custody for Sonic
Device makerStatusWhat users can and cannot do
LedgerPartialSame as native: UnknownCan: Possibly add a Sonic account in Ledger Wallet: Ledger's wallet code includes Sonic among its EVM-family networks, but behind a feature switch that is off unless Ledger turns it on remotely
Can: Read Sonic balances through a Ledger-hosted Sonic node, which Ledger's status page lists
Cannot: Rely on a readable Ledger page for Sonic: Ledger's Sonic coin page returned not found and its support article did not render
Cannot: Treat the older Fantom Opera network, which Ledger Wallet does enable by default, as Sonic: Opera is a separate chain with its own historyRecorded as partial under the custody evidence rule and the shared vendor baseline. Ledger's current wallet code (develop branch, read 27 September 2026) has a Sonic network tied to a feature switch declared with no default value, so it is off unless switched on remotely; no readable Ledger page confirms it is on. The earlier native reading rested on a published library configuration, Ledger's status page and its asset registry, which the rule does not accept as enough for native. 383940 As of Sep 27, 2026.
TrezorThrough an intermediaryMetaMask or RabbySame as native: NoCan: Manage S with a Trezor Safe 3, Safe 5 or Safe 7 through MetaMask or Rabby, per Trezor's Sonic page
Cannot: Manage Sonic in the Trezor Suite app, which Trezor's page says does not support itTrezor's page lists Sonic as the only network for this asset and does not mention Fantom or FTM. 37 As of Sep 27, 2026.

Public data

iKnow Blockchain has no public-data lookups for Sonic yet. This is a limit of the service, not a statement about the network.

Public-data lookups for Sonic
LookupStatusWhat it covers and its limits
Address or accountNot available yetPublic-data lookups for this chain are not built yet.
Tokens and assetsNot available yetPublic-data lookups for this chain are not built yet.
NFTsNot available yetPublic-data lookups for this chain are not built yet.
TransactionsNot available yetPublic-data lookups for this chain are not built yet.

A lookup covers one address or transaction from one provider. It is never a complete wallet, and an error or private value is reported as unknown, not zero. About public data · Connect your AI

Sourced developments

Developments: Review overdue Reviewed Sep 27, 2026; next review was due Oct 7, 2026, 12:00 UTC.

Publication date · newest first

Topics your AI can explain

Your AI can explain these topics for Sonic through the connection, with sources.

Known gaps

What this profile's review did not establish:

Sources

Oldest dated source check: Source checked Sep 27, 2026 Next check due Oct 27, 2026.

All 40 sources were checked in the last 30 days.

  1. Technology Overview (external site)Sonic Labs docs · retrieved
  2. Consensus (external site)Sonic Labs docs · retrieved
  3. Database Storage (external site)Sonic Labs docs · retrieved
  4. EVM Compatibility (external site)Sonic Labs docs · retrieved
  5. Account Abstraction (external site)Sonic Labs docs · retrieved
  6. Bundled Transactions (external site)Sonic Labs docs · retrieved
  7. Gas Pricing (external site)Sonic Labs docs · retrieved
  8. Gas Subsidies (external site)Sonic Labs docs · retrieved
  9. Validator Node (external site)Sonic Labs docs · retrieved
  10. Archive Node (external site)Sonic Labs docs · retrieved
  11. S Token (external site)Sonic Labs docs · retrieved
  12. Sonic Gateway (external site)Sonic Labs docs · retrieved
  13. Wallets (external site)Sonic Labs docs · retrieved
  14. Tooling and Infra (external site)Sonic Labs docs · retrieved
  15. USSD (external site)Sonic Labs docs · retrieved
  16. Sonic client changelog (external site)Sonic Labs (GitHub) · retrieved
  17. 0xsoniclabs/sonic README (external site)Sonic Labs (GitHub) · retrieved
  18. SFC.sol (Sonic staking contract source) (external site)Sonic Labs (GitHub, 0xsoniclabs/sonic-sfc) · retrieved
  19. ConstantsManager.sol (staking constants contract source) (external site)Sonic Labs (GitHub, 0xsoniclabs/sonic-sfc) · retrieved
  20. NetworkInitializer.sol (genesis staking constants) (external site)Sonic Labs (GitHub, 0xsoniclabs/sonic-sfc) · retrieved
  21. Sonic Mainnet 2.2 is Now Live (external site)Cryptowisser (news report of Sonic Labs' announcement on X, 23 September 2026) · retrieved
  22. aBFT Consensus (go-lachesis wiki) (external site)Fantom Foundation (GitHub) · retrieved
  23. Lachesis: Scalable Asynchronous BFT on DAG Streams (external site)arXiv (Nguyen, Cronje, Kong, Lysenko, Guzev) · retrieved
  24. Sonic Mainnet Launch: EVM-Compatible, Verifiable 10,000 TPS, and Sub-Second Finality (external site)Sonic Labs blog · retrieved
  25. The Ultimate Sonic Upgrade Handbook: FTM to S (external site)Sonic Labs blog · retrieved
  26. Sonic's Successful Network Migration: What This Means for Fantom Opera (external site)Sonic Labs blog · retrieved
  27. The First 1% (external site)Sonic Labs blog · retrieved
  28. Day 100 - Where We Are, And Where We're Headed. (external site)Sonic Labs blog · retrieved
  29. USSD: Sonic's Native, Permissionless USD Stablecoin Built With Frax (external site)Sonic Labs blog · retrieved
  30. Sonic Gateway Audit (external site)OpenZeppelin · retrieved
  31. USDC Contract Addresses (external site)Circle · retrieved
  32. CCTP supported blockchains (external site)Circle · retrieved
  33. What is Beets? (external site)Beets docs · retrieved
  34. Shadow Exchange (GitHub organization) (external site)Shadow Exchange (GitHub) · retrieved
  35. SonicScan: Sonic Explorer (external site)Etherscan · retrieved
  36. eip155-146.json (Sonic Mainnet) (external site)ethereum-lists/chains (GitHub) · retrieved
  37. Safe & secure Sonic wallet (external site)Trezor · retrieved
  38. Ledger Wallet EVM network configuration (@ledgerhq/live-common 36.0.0, families/evm/config.js) (external site)Ledger (npm package via jsDelivr) · retrieved
  39. Ledger Status (external site)Ledger · retrieved
  40. currencySonic feature switch definition (ledger-live, develop branch) (external site)Ledger (LedgerHQ GitHub organisation) · retrieved

Report an error

Found something wrong or out of date? Reporting is free, and every chain goes through the same process. Published corrections appear in the public log.

Funding disclosure

Funding disclosures appear here when an upkeep arrangement exists, in the form “Upkeep funded by [name]; verdicts unaffected.” The funder ledger has not been published yet. Neutrality & funding