Website catalogue: 151 chains. Current AI connection: 14 chains; approved accounts only.

Other system

Harmony ticker ONE

  • Historical network
  • No public-data lookups yet
  • 5 reviewed developments
  • 40 cited sources

Historical network. Its profile describes the design as history. The evidence is in the system note below.

Summary

Until 10 September 2026 Harmony ran its own proof-of-stake chain split into two shards: shard 0, which also served as the beacon chain, and shard 1 (there were four shards until November 2023). ONE holders staked or delegated to validators. At the end of each 32,768-block epoch (about 18 hours) an election assigned voting slots, holding each key's effective stake between 85% and 115% of the median. On each shard a leader proposed a block about every 2 seconds and validators signed it with aggregated BLS signatures in a PBFT-style protocol Harmony calls FBFT; a block committed once signatures from more than two thirds of voting power were collected. Shard blocks were cross-linked into the beacon chain. After an exploit in August 2026 the chain was rolled back, and it stopped producing blocks at the September 2026 migration cutoff. 1231213141516

Design

System
Other systemHarmony no longer runs as a chain. It was a permissionless, sharded proof-of-stake layer 1 with an Ethereum-compatible virtual machine (shard 0 EVM chain ID 1666600000). Harmony announced on 6 September 2026 that it would retire the chain, citing threats from state-backed attackers and AI agents; the last shard-0 block came at 14:41:43 UTC on 10 September 2026, just after the migration snapshot. ONE balances are to move to a fixed-supply ONE token on Ethereum, an ordinary token rather than a layer 2. As a halted chain it is described here as history, not as a live layer 1.
Settlement family
Ethereum / EVM
Scarce resource
Stake (proof of stake)
State model
Accounts
Finality
Economic finality
Who makes blocks
One leader per shard per round, rotating among elected validator keys since October 2024, with a view change replacing a failed leader. In the final epoch (3030) 43 validators were elected: shard 0 had 196 voting slots from 27 validator accounts and shard 1 had 204 slots from 32 accounts. Harmony's own nodes held 2 slots per shard with 1% of voting power. On each shard the five largest accounts together held more than a third of voting power. No leader has produced a block since 10 September 2026.
Fork choice
No open weight-based fork choice: a block committed once more than two thirds of voting power had signed it, and shards followed the beacon chain for committee elections. In August 2026 Harmony developers and validators discarded every block after shard 0 height 92,730,034 and shard 1 height 94,978,278 and restarted from those checkpoints, with node software that rejects the abandoned blocks by hash. The final state is fixed because no new blocks are produced.

Qualifications

Tradeoffs

This view follows one way of thinking about design priorities, often called the blockchain trilemma. The design-priorities lesson sets out the counter-view. Read the design-priorities lesson.

Emphasizes
Scalability and Security
Gives up
Broad participation and continuity. Sharding and 2-second blocks came with a small elected validator set in practice (43 elected validators, and five accounts above a third of voting power on each shard at the end), full nodes that needed several terabytes of traffic a month, and security failures answered by developer-coordinated intervention: a recovery fund after the 2022 bridge theft, a rollback after an exploit in August 2026, and finally a snapshot-and-migrate plan that ended the chain in September 2026.Security is listed because Harmony's docs describe random, reshuffled assignment of validators to shards as the defence against taking over a single shard, and because blocks needed two thirds of voting power. The node repository still lists resharding as planned rather than done, and the August 2026 rollback shows that committed blocks could still be reversed by coordinated operators. The emphasis describes the design goals, not the outcome.
Full node at home
Not applicable 41618There is no live network to follow: shard 0 has produced no block since 14:41:43 UTC on 10 September 2026. While it ran, Harmony listed for a shard-0 validator 8 dedicated cores, 8 GB of RAM, a 1 TB SSD using Harmony's snapshot database (NVMe recommended), 50 Mb/s of bandwidth and 5 to 6 TB of data per month. A shard-0 RPC or explorer node needed a 6 TB SSD and a shard-0 archive node 32 to 36 TB; shard 1 needed far less storage and computing power but the same bandwidth.
Throughput claims
No classified figure recorded

Scaling layers

No scaling layer recorded in this profile.

Capabilities

Capabilities of Harmony: how each one is provided, or its research status
CapabilityHow it is providedNotes and sources
Account abstractionStructured assessment pendingNot yet assessed for any chain.
Atomic swapsNot presentNone: shard 0 has produced no block since 10 September 2026, so no swap can settle on Harmony. While the chain ran, only building blocks were recorded: EVM contracts could have implemented hash time-locked swaps, but no protocol-level swap mechanism or deployed swap tool was verified. 16
Authenticated data publicationUnknownNot yet assessed under this row's current definition.
Light clientsNot presentNone: shard 0 has produced no block since 10 September 2026, so there is no new state to verify, and no user-facing light client for Harmony was verified while it ran. Cross-links let the beacon chain record shard blocks, which is internal bookkeeping rather than light verification for users. 316
Native staking or delegationStructured assessment pendingNot yet assessed for any chain.
On-chain governanceStructured assessment pendingNot yet assessed for any chain.
Parallel executionStructured assessment pendingNot yet assessed for any chain.
Payment or state channelsUnknownNo source was cited for absence, so the rule that absence needs a source makes this unknown. The earlier review found no payment or state channel layer anchored to Harmony, and none can operate on a halted chain.
Programmable spendingNone found Earlier definitionNothing can execute since the halt. While the chain ran, spend conditions were EVM smart contracts, including multisig and smart-contract wallets such as 1wallet, alongside separate staking transaction types. The migration does not carry contract code over; reviewed multisig and 1wallet balances are handled in a later stage. 111620
Protocol-verified messagingStructured assessment pendingNot yet assessed for any chain.
Reversible transfers or recoveryNot presentNone: no mechanism for a sender to reclaim or delay a payment, or for an owner to regain control through a recovery path set up in advance, was found. HIP-30 sent a quarter of new ONE issuance to a recovery multisig to fund repayment of bridge-hack losses; that was a governance fund, not a feature users could set on their own accounts. Nothing can execute since the halt. 1623
RollupsNone found Earlier definitionNo rollup settling to Harmony was found. The planned replacement ONE token is an ordinary token on Ethereum itself, not a Harmony layer 2. 22
Shielded transfersStructured assessment pendingNot yet assessed for any chain.
Signed partial offersUnknownNot yet assessed under this row's current definition.
Reading these values
How this feature is provided
Built into the protocol, core-team software or independent software says where a feature lives and who can change it. These are implementation layers, not quality: core-team software is not closer to the protocol than independent software.
Structured assessment pending
The shared review has not assessed this feature for any chain yet (Account abstraction, Native staking or delegation, On-chain governance, Parallel execution, Protocol-verified messaging and Shielded transfers). That does not mean it is absent, and a chain’s profile may already describe it.
Unknown
The review has not established this for this chain under the current definition; the note beside it says why. Unknown is not absent and not a low score. A feature reads “Not present” only when a source shows it is absent.
Earlier definition
Payment or state channels, Programmable spending and Rollups keep the earlier definition until the next fact-check. There, “Native” does not separate the protocol from core-team software, “Ecosystem software” does not say who publishes it, and “Partial” does not say which layer.
Reading across rows
The list of capabilities is incomplete. Do not read these rows as a chain leading or lagging overall.

Definitions, schema version and review history

Ecosystem & custody

Ecosystem products for Harmony
Product typeStatusNotes and sources
Automated market makersNone foundCurve (no value on Harmony), ViperSwap (inactive)No exchange can operate on the halted chain. DefiLlama still lists former Harmony exchanges: on 27 September 2026 it showed Curve with no value locked on Harmony and ViperSwap with none at all, and put Harmony's whole total under $10,000. The full list of former exchanges was not reviewed. The migration does not recreate liquidity-pool positions. 20282930 As of Sep 27, 2026.
Issuer-native stablecoinsNone foundNeither Circle's USDC list nor Tether's list of supported blockchains includes Harmony. Stablecoins on Harmony were bridged representations, such as 1USDC from Ethereum, and nothing can move on the halted chain. The migration FAQ says bridged assets will be claimable on their origin chains. 5203132 As of Sep 27, 2026.
Algorithmic stablecoinsNone foundNo stablecoin of any design can operate on the halted chain. Algorithmic stablecoin projects that may once have run on Harmony were not reviewed. 16 As of Sep 27, 2026.
BridgesNone foundLayerZero bridge (stopped with the chain), Horizon bridge (drained in 2022)No bridge transfer to or from Harmony can complete after the halt. While it ran, Harmony's docs pointed users to a LayerZero-based bridge to Ethereum and BNB Chain; the earlier Horizon bridge lost about $100 million in June 2022, a theft the FBI attributed in January 2023 to North Korea's Lazarus Group. The migration FAQ plans claim contracts on origin chains for bridged assets and on Ethereum for ONE held on other chains. Risk: Horizon was reported to be guarded by a 2-of-5 multisig, so two stolen keys were enough to drain it, and tokens it had issued on Harmony lost their backing. Assets bridged to Harmony, and ONE-based tokens on other chains, now depend on claim contracts not verified as deployed. After the 11 August 2026 exploit the FAQ reports about 2.412 billion forged wrapped ONE still on BNB Smart Chain and 12.9 million on Ethereum, and says it will most likely use a pre-hack snapshot for those claims. 56720232425 As of Sep 27, 2026.
Block explorersFirst-partyHarmony Explorer (Blockscout)The explorer at explorer.harmony.one, now built on Blockscout and listed in the Ethereum chain registry, still serves history up to the final block of 10 September 2026 and reported no transactions on 27 September 2026. No second explorer was verified. Explorer data is provider-indexed, not consensus. 171819 As of Sep 27, 2026.
Hardware walletsThinLedger (through Harmony's tools or MetaMask), Trezor (through MetaMask or Rabby)See the custody section: both vendors list Harmony, but the documented signing paths run through third-party software, and the chain no longer processes transactions. 93337 As of Sep 27, 2026.

Hardware-wallet custody

Hardware-wallet custody for Harmony
Device makerStatusWhat users can and cannot do
LedgerThrough an intermediaryHarmony's staking dashboard with the Harmony device app, or MetaMask with Ledger's Ethereum appSame as native: UnknownCan: Hold the key for a Harmony address using the Harmony device app, which Harmony's docs say was for the Nano S only and installed through Ledger Live's developer mode
Can: Sign Harmony transfers through MetaMask with Ledger's Ethereum app, as Harmony's docs describe, while the chain was running
Cannot: Send, receive or stake ONE on Harmony: the chain has produced no blocks since 10 September 2026
Cannot: Count on Ledger Wallet itself: Ledger's Harmony page describes managing ONE there, but Ledger's currency definitions have no Harmony entry and Ledger archived its Harmony app repository in January 2025The Ethereum chain registry gives Harmony its own key-path coin type (1023). Whether accounts made with the Harmony device app appear under Ledger's default Ethereum path, where the migrated token would be held, was not tested. 89161933343536 As of Sep 27, 2026.
TrezorThrough an intermediaryMetaMask or Rabby, listed on Trezor's Harmony pageSame as native: NoCan: Keep the key for a Harmony Shard 0 address on a Trezor Safe 3, 5 or 7 and connect it to MetaMask or Rabby, as Trezor's Harmony page lists
Cannot: Manage Harmony in Trezor Suite; Trezor's page says it is not supported there
Cannot: Stake with a Trezor: Harmony's docs say Trezor signs through its Ethereum firmware and that staking would need Harmony-specific firmware that did not exist
Cannot: Send or receive on Harmony: no blocks since 10 September 2026 101637 As of Sep 27, 2026.

Public data

iKnow Blockchain has no public-data lookups for Harmony yet. This is a limit of the service, not a statement about the network.

Public-data lookups for Harmony
LookupStatusWhat it covers and its limits
Address or accountNot available yetPublic-data lookups for this chain are not built yet.
Tokens and assetsNot available yetPublic-data lookups for this chain are not built yet.
NFTsNot available yetPublic-data lookups for this chain are not built yet.
TransactionsNot available yetPublic-data lookups for this chain are not built yet.

A lookup covers one address or transaction from one provider. It is never a complete wallet, and an error or private value is reported as unknown, not zero. About public data · Connect your AI

Sourced developments

Developments: Review overdue Reviewed Sep 27, 2026; next review was due Oct 7, 2026, 12:00 UTC.

Publication date · newest first

Topics your AI can explain

Your AI can explain these topics for Harmony through the connection, with sources.

Known gaps

What this profile's review did not establish:

Sources

Oldest dated source check: Source checked Sep 27, 2026 Next check due Oct 27, 2026.

All 40 sources were checked in the last 30 days.

  1. Consensus (external site)Harmony · retrieved
  2. Effective Proof-of-Stake (external site)Harmony · retrieved
  3. Sharding (external site)Harmony · retrieved
  4. Requirements (external site)Harmony · retrieved
  5. What token will I get after the bridge (external site)Harmony · retrieved
  6. LayerZero Bridge (external site)Harmony · retrieved
  7. LayerZero Bridge: Important Notice (external site)Harmony · retrieved
  8. Ledger Nano: Download & Setup (external site)Harmony · retrieved
  9. Ledger with Metamask (external site)Harmony · retrieved
  10. Trezor (external site)Harmony · retrieved
  11. harmony-one/harmony: the core protocol of Harmony (external site)Harmony (GitHub) · retrieved
  12. Mainnet Release 2023.3.0 (HIP-30 hard fork) (external site)Harmony (GitHub) · retrieved
  13. Mainnet Release 2024.3.1 (HIP-32 phase 1) (external site)Harmony (GitHub) · retrieved
  14. Node operator rollback guide (rollback-92730034 branch) (external site)Harmony (GitHub) · retrieved
  15. Reject abandoned branch hashes (#5106) (external site)Harmony (GitHub) · retrieved
  16. Harmony shard 0 public RPC (block, epoch, committee and node metadata reads) (external site)Harmony · retrieved
  17. Harmony Mainnet blockchain explorer (external site)Harmony (Blockscout) · retrieved
  18. Harmony explorer statistics API (external site)Harmony (Blockscout) · retrieved
  19. Harmony Mainnet Shard 0 chain record (eip155-1666600000) (external site)ethereum-lists maintainers · retrieved
  20. Harmony migration user FAQ (external site)harmony-migration repository (polymorpher) · retrieved
  21. Harmony migration accounting (external site)harmony-migration repository (polymorpher) · retrieved
  22. HarmonyONEToken.sol (external site)Harmony (GitHub, harmony-one/erc20) · retrieved
  23. HIP30v2: Harmony's Network Evolution and Token Redistribution (external site)Harmony · retrieved
  24. FBI: Lazarus Group carried out Harmony's Horizon Protocol attack (reports the FBI statement of 23 January 2023) (external site)CryptoSlate · retrieved
  25. Over $1 billion stolen from bridges so far in 2022 as Harmony's Horizon Bridge becomes latest victim in $100 million hack (external site)Elliptic · retrieved
  26. Harmony to fully sunset Layer 1, proposes token migration to Ethereum for AI video initiative (external site)The Block · retrieved
  27. Harmony plans to sunset layer 1 and migrate ONE token to Ethereum (external site)crypto.news · retrieved
  28. DefiLlama protocols API (external site)DefiLlama · retrieved
  29. DefiLlama chains API (value locked per chain) (external site)DefiLlama · retrieved
  30. DefiLlama value locked: ViperSwap (external site)DefiLlama · retrieved
  31. USDC contract addresses (external site)Circle · retrieved
  32. Supported protocols (external site)Tether · retrieved
  33. Harmony Wallet (external site)Ledger · retrieved
  34. @ledgerhq/cryptoassets currency definitions (v13.56.0) (external site)Ledger · retrieved
  35. LedgerHQ/app-harmony-one (archived 2 January 2025) (external site)Ledger (GitHub) · retrieved
  36. Ledger with Staking Dashboard (external site)Harmony · retrieved
  37. Harmony wallet (external site)Trezor · retrieved
  38. Harmony: The Remix Economy for AI Video (external site)Harmony · retrieved
  39. Harmony's Newsletter archive (external site)Harmony · retrieved
  40. Slashing and Uptime (external site)Harmony · retrieved

Report an error

Found something wrong or out of date? Reporting is free, and every chain goes through the same process. Published corrections appear in the public log.

Funding disclosure

Funding disclosures appear here when an upkeep arrangement exists, in the form “Upkeep funded by [name]; verdicts unaffected.” The funder ledger has not been published yet. Neutrality & funding