Layer 1 blockchain
NEAR Protocol ticker NEAR
Summary
Proof-of-stake chain with sharded execution (Nightshade): each block references chunks produced per shard, and dynamic resharding (NEP-639, stabilized in nearcore 2.13.0) changes the shard layout. Sharding is part of the L1 protocol, not a rollup. Validators are chosen by stake each epoch; the top 100 act as block and chunk producers and further validators act as chunk validators. In nearcore's production mode a block can be produced only with approvals from at least 2/3 of stake. 45689102729
Design
- System
- Layer 1 blockchain
- Settlement family
- Its own design
- Scarce resource
- Stake (proof of stake)
- State model
- Accounts
- Finality
- Other
- Who makes blocks
- Stake-selected validators: the top 100 produce blocks and chunks (one shard each); additional chunk validators validate and endorse chunks.
- Fork choice
- Block production follows stake-weighted approvals (Doomslug in nearcore, 2/3-of-stake threshold in production), not work-weighted longest chain. A primary-doc description of the exact finality rule was not reviewed.
Qualifications
- Finality · Contested. Blocks become final through approvals from at least 2/3 of stake. NEAR's protocol specification (epoch manager page, updated March 2025) says slashing is currently disabled, while the general validators page on docs.near.org describes misbehaving validators being slashed. Following the specification, finality is classed as committee finality without enforced slashing, not as economic finality.
- Sharding · Applies. Sharding is in-protocol L1 execution split across shards, not a rollup or L2; shard count and layout are live facts not frozen here.
- Aurora · Partial. Aurora is an Ethereum-compatible execution environment implemented on NEAR with its own chain IDs and ETH-denominated fees; it is not recorded as a rollup settling to NEAR.
- Private shard · Unknown. NEAR's homepage describes a private shard run by seven permissioned validators and linked to mainnet by a TEE-based bridge; this review did not verify it beyond that page.
- Settlement family · Partial. Recorded as other: NEAR runs its own protocol and node software (nearcore), with Nightshade sharding, stake-selected validators and WebAssembly contracts.
Tradeoffs
- Emphasizes
- Scalability Contested
- Gives up
- Synchronous composability: cross-contract and cross-shard work runs as asynchronous receipts that may complete in later blocks, so applications must handle partial completion. Block and chunk production is concentrated in the top 100 validators.NEAR's homepage states 1M TPS without a method or window; that headline is treated as a theoretical peak. NEAR docs present lower-requirement chunk validators as widening participation; how far that offsets producer concentration is contested.
- Full node at home
- Practical at home 111213The published mainnet RPC node (a node type separate from validators) needs 8 cores/16 threads, 16GB RAM and a 2.5TB SATA3-class SSD with 15k IOPS as a minimum, or 32GB RAM and a 4TB NVMe SSD as recommended. That is desktop-class hardware at the upper end of home setups. Block/chunk producers need 48GB RAM with a 2TB SATA3 SSD to 3TB NVMe; chunk validators 8-16GB RAM with a 1TB SATA3 SSD to 2TB NVMe, both on at least 8 physical x86_64 cores. NEAR advises about 8GiB of extra RAM headroom or swap.
- Throughput claims
- Theoretical peak: 1,000,000 tx/s 14Theoretical peak; not comparable across chains or with observed load.Homepage headline with no stated method, window, shard count, transaction type or hardware; classified here as a peak claim, not observed mainnet load. Ignores propagation, state growth and cross-shard receipt latency; not comparable to another chain's figure.
Scaling layers
No scaling layer recorded in this profile.
Capabilities
| Capability | How it is provided | Notes and sources |
|---|---|---|
| Account abstraction | Structured assessment pending | Not yet assessed for any chain. |
| Atomic swaps | Unknown | Not yet assessed under the current definitions; NEAR Intents: the Verifier contract (intents.near), in the near GitHub organization, settles matched signed intents atomically, but only for balances users have first deposited into it, so the contract holds those funds (contract-custody risk). The cited sources name no organization that publishes it, so its layer is not established. No protocol-level multi-party atomic swap primitive was found, cross-contract calls run in separate blocks and do not roll back automatically, and cross-chain legs depend on bridges or market makers. 3152527 |
| Authenticated data publication | Unknown | Not yet assessed under this row's current definition. |
| Light clients | Built into the protocolLimited scope | The protocol specification (Nomicon) defines a light client that tracks each epoch's block-producer sets and accepts headers carrying approvals from more than 2/3 of stake, which consensus produces. Scope is limited: execution-outcome proofs come from an RPC method NEAR labels experimental (EXPERIMENTAL_light_client_proof), so proof retrieval depends on an RPC provider, and adoption of production light clients was not reviewed. 26 |
| Native staking or delegation | Structured assessment pending | Not yet assessed for any chain. |
| On-chain governance | Structured assessment pending | Not yet assessed for any chain. |
| Parallel execution | Structured assessment pending | Not yet assessed for any chain. |
| Payment or state channels | Unknown | No documented payment or state channel layer anchored to NEAR was reviewed. |
| Programmable spending | Native (protocol or core-team software) Earlier definition | WebAssembly contracts plus per-account access keys, including restricted function-call keys. 127 |
| Protocol-verified messaging | Structured assessment pending | Not yet assessed for any chain. |
| Reversible transfers or recovery | Unknown | Not yet assessed under the current definitions; accounts can hold multiple access keys, but key management by the current key holders is not a recovery path under this row, and no protocol-level sender reclaim or cancellable delayed transfer, and no timed recovery-vault schedule, was verified. 2 |
| Rollups | Unknown | No rollup settling to NEAR was verified. Sharding is not a rollup and Aurora is not recorded as one. |
| Shielded transfers | Structured assessment pending | Not yet assessed for any chain. |
| Signed partial offers | Unknown | Not yet assessed under this row's current definition. |
Reading these values
- How this feature is provided
- Built into the protocol, core-team software or independent software says where a feature lives and who can change it. These are implementation layers, not quality: core-team software is not closer to the protocol than independent software.
- Structured assessment pending
- The shared review has not assessed this feature for any chain yet (Account abstraction, Native staking or delegation, On-chain governance, Parallel execution, Protocol-verified messaging and Shielded transfers). That does not mean it is absent, and a chain’s profile may already describe it.
- Unknown
- The review has not established this for this chain under the current definition; the note beside it says why. Unknown is not absent and not a low score. A feature reads “Not present” only when a source shows it is absent.
- Earlier definition
- Payment or state channels, Programmable spending and Rollups keep the earlier definition until the next fact-check. There, “Native” does not separate the protocol from core-team software, “Ecosystem software” does not say who publishes it, and “Partial” does not say which layer.
- Reading across rows
- The list of capabilities is incomplete. Do not read these rows as a chain leading or lagging overall.
Ecosystem & custody
| Product type | Status | Notes and sources |
|---|---|---|
| Automated market makers | Established in the ecosystemRHEA Finance | RHEA Finance, evolved from Ref Finance and Burrow, documents trading and liquidity on NEAR. Liquidity depth was not measured. 17 |
| Issuer-native stablecoins | Established in the ecosystemUSDC (Circle) | Circle lists natively issued USDC on NEAR (contract 17208628f84f5d6ad33f0da3bbbeb27ffcb398eac501a31bd6ad2011e36133a1). Native means issuer-issued on NEAR, not a protocol asset. 19 |
| Algorithmic stablecoins | Unknown | Algorithmic or hybrid stablecoins on NEAR were not reviewed. |
| Bridges | First-partyOmni Bridge, NEAR Intents (cross-chain components) | Omni Bridge lists Ethereum, Bitcoin, Zcash, Solana, Base, BNB, Arbitrum and Polygon. NEAR Intents deposits and withdrawals also use a Proof-of-Authority (POA) bridge and the HOT bridge. Circle CCTP does not list NEAR. Risk: Omni Bridge: light client plus Chain Signatures MPC for Ethereum, Bitcoin and Zcash; Wormhole plus Chain Signatures for the others, adding Wormhole's guardian assumptions. NEAR Intents routes use Omni Bridge, a POA bridge with the widest chain list (including Bitcoin, XRP, Zcash, Tron, Sui, Aptos, Cardano, Starknet and several EVM chains), or the HOT bridge, whose security model the reviewed page does not state. POA routes add operator/custodial trust; swaps filled by market makers (solvers) add counterparty and liveness risk. 1516202425 |
| Block explorers | Established in the ecosystemNearBlocks | NearBlocks is an open-repository explorer covering blocks, receipts, transactions and accounts. Other explorers were not reviewed; indexing can lag canonical RPC. 18 |
| Hardware wallets | Established in the ecosystemLedger | See custody rows: NEAR is on by default in Ledger's own wallet app; Trezor states it does not support NEAR. One major vendor has native support. 21223031 |
Hardware-wallet custody
| Device maker | Status | What users can and cannot do |
|---|---|---|
| Ledger | Native supportSame as native: Yes | Can: Add a NEAR account and stake NEAR through Ledger Wallet, per Ledger's product page Can: Send, receive and stake NEAR in Ledger Live (now Ledger Wallet), with staking offered through the Ledger by Figment validator, per Ledger's January 2023 announcementLedger Wallet's current code registers a NEAR module with no feature switch, so NEAR is on for all users. Ledger's NEAR support articles could not be loaded for this review, so device-app details (who maintains it, which models) were not verified. 21283031 |
| Trezor | None foundSame as native: No | Cannot: Use a Trezor device for NEAR; Trezor states it does not currently support NEAR Protocol 22 |
Public data
Your AI can request these lookups through the connection. The website itself runs no lookups. Networks: mainnet, testnet.
| Lookup | Status | What it covers and its limits |
|---|---|---|
| Address or account | Available | canonical finalized native account state, protocol locked amount, and storage stake estimate |
| Tokens and assets | Available | FastNear indexed FT balances/relationships plus bounded standard NFT token and staking-pool account probes |
| NFTs | Not available yet | Not implemented in this build |
| Transactions | Available | FastNear indexed transaction outcome and returned receipt execution outcomes by hash |
Sourced developments
Developments: Review overdue Reviewed Sep 26, 2026; next review was due Oct 6, 2026, 07:35 UTC.
Publication date · newest first
-
nearcore 2.14.0-rc.2 published for testing
The direct nearcore tag identifies 2.14.0-rc.2 as a prerelease with no protocol upgrade. A release candidate is testing evidence, not proof that mainnet validators adopted it.
- Implementation:Release candidate
- Release:Pre release
- Activation:Not asserted
Source: NEAR nearcore — nearcore 2.14.0-rc.2 (external site)
-
nearcore 2.13.4 security release
nearcore 2.13.4 included a critical denial-of-service fix. Its notes did not announce a protocol upgrade, so node-release and protocol-version status remain separate.
- Implementation:Released
- Release:Stable
- Activation:Not applicable to protocol version
-
nearcore 2.13.0 shipped protocol-upgrade and operator-breaking changes
nearcore 2.13.0 shipped protocol changes including ML-DSA-65 transaction/access keys, Gas Keys and DelegateV2, dynamic resharding, and a direct protocol-version move from 84 to 86. It also removed centralized ExternalStorage state sync and included DB migration 48 to 49 for continuous epoch sync. Mainnet RPC later observed version 86 on 2026-09-25; that dated observation supports activation of version-gated features but is not a functional transaction, gas-key, or resharding test.
- Proposal:Mixed draft documents
- Implementation:Released
- Release:Stable
- Activation:mainnet-protocol-86-observed-2026-09-25; feature behavior not directly exercised
Sources: NEAR nearcore — nearcore 2.13.0 (external site) · NEAR NEPs — NEP-639: Dynamic Resharding (external site) · NEAR NEPs — NEP-645: Post-Quantum Transactions (external site)
-
Near One described work toward a Wasmtime contract runtime
Near One published work on replacing NEAR's contract VM with Wasmtime. The article is relevant research but alone does not establish protocol activation or mainnet availability.
- Implementation:Research and development
- Release:Not established
- Activation:Not established
Source: Near One — Replacing NEAR's Contract VM with Wasmtime (external site)
-
NEP-645 proposed post-quantum transaction access keys
NEP-645 documents ML-DSA transaction authorization, says Draft, and states stabilization at protocol version 85 in neard 2.13. Its scope excludes validator/block signing and implicit-account derivation. Mainnet protocol 86 was observed later, but no ML-DSA transaction was exercised by this review.
- Proposal:Draft at review
- Implementation:stated-stable-at-protocol-85-and-shipped-in-neard-2.13
- Release:Released code
- Activation:inferred-available-from-mainnet-protocol-86-observation; not transaction-tested
Sources: NEAR NEPs — NEP-645: Post-Quantum Transactions (external site) · NEAR nearcore — nearcore 2.13.0 (external site)
-
NEP-639 documented dynamic resharding
NEP-639 described dynamic resharding. The individual proposal said Draft while the repository index showed Final; this record preserves the conflict and uses the proposal's narrower status. nearcore 2.13.0 states the feature was stabilized and mainnet protocol 86 was later observed, but this review did not independently observe a resharding event.
- Proposal:Draft at review with index conflict
- Implementation:stated-stabilized-in-nearcore-2.13.0
- Release:Released code
- Activation:protocol-86-observed-mainnet-2026-09-25; resharding event not independently observed
Sources: NEAR NEPs — NEP-639: Dynamic Resharding (external site) · NEAR — NEAR Enhancement Proposals (external site) · NEAR nearcore — nearcore 2.13.0 (external site)
Topics your AI can explain
Your AI can explain these topics for NEAR Protocol through the connection, with sources.
Known gaps
What this profile's review did not establish:
- Exact finality rule (Doomslug vs BFT finality) not confirmed in current primary docs. NEAR's own pages disagree on slashing: the protocol specification says it is currently disabled, while docs.near.org's validators page describes slashing. Finality is classed as committee finality without slashing on the specification's word; if slashing is shown to be enforced on mainnet, reclassify it as economic finality.
- The 1M TPS homepage figure has no published method or window in the reviewed page; a methodology source would allow reclassification.
- Private shard (seven permissioned validators, TEE bridge) seen only on the homepage; status and security model unverified.
- No rollup or channel layer anchored to NEAR was verified, so this profile lists no scaling layers.
- Ledger NEAR support rests on Ledger Wallet's current code (NEAR registered with no feature switch), a product page and a 2023 Ledger blog post; Ledger's support articles were not loadable, so the device app's maintainer and supported models are unverified.
- The home node rating rests on the RPC node guide, which lists no bandwidth figure; state growth under dynamic resharding was not measured.
- The light-client rating rests on the protocol spec; whether maintained production light clients are in use, and whether the spec reflects the current chunk-validator design, was not verified.
- The HOT bridge's operator and security model, and the POA bridge's authority set and custody arrangements, are not described on the reviewed pages.
- Reversible or delayed transfers and recovery paths, algorithmic stablecoins and other explorers were not reviewed.
Sources
Oldest dated source check: Source checked Sep 27, 2026 Next check due Oct 27, 2026.
- Account Model (external site)
- Access Keys (external site)
- How Transactions and Receipts Work (external site)
- Block and Chunk RPC (external site)
- NEP-639: Dynamic Resharding (external site)
- nearcore 2.13.0 (external site)
- Replacing NEAR's Contract VM with Wasmtime (external site)
- Validators (external site)
- How neard works (external site)
- nearcore doomslug.rs (external site)
- Hardware requirements for RPC node (external site)
- Hardware requirements for validator node (external site)
- Node types (external site)
- NEAR Blockchain (external site)
- NEAR Intents smart contracts (external site)
- Omni Bridge overview (external site)
- RHEA Finance Guide (external site)
- NearBlocks explorer (external site)
- USDC contract addresses (external site)
- CCTP supported blockchains (external site)
- NEAR Protocol wallet (external site)
- NEAR Protocol wallet (external site)
- Aurora Documentation (external site)
- Token Bridges (external site)
- NEAR Intents (external site)
- Light Client (external site)
- Cross-Contract Calls (external site)
- Send, Receive & Stake NEAR Tokens Through Ledger Live (external site)
- Epoch Manager (slashing is currently disabled) (external site)
- Ledger Wallet coin-module loaders (loaders.ts, develop branch) (external site)
- Ledger Wallet currencies gated by feature switches (useCurrenciesUnderFeatureFlag.ts, develop branch) (external site)
Report an error
Found something wrong or out of date? Reporting is free, and every chain goes through the same process. Published corrections appear in the public log.
Funding disclosure
Funding disclosures appear here when an upkeep arrangement exists, in the form “Upkeep funded by [name]; verdicts unaffected.” The funder ledger has not been published yet. Neutrality & funding