Layer 2 blockchain · settles to Ethereum
Ronin ticker RON
Summary
Ethereum Layer 2 on the OP Stack since 12 May 2026; before that Ronin used a hand-picked validator set (2021) and then delegated proof of stake (April 2023). One sequencer, operated by Conduit, orders transactions into roughly 2-second blocks and streams preconfirmed partial blocks about every 250 ms. Batch data is posted to EigenDA and only commitments reach Ethereum. State roots are proposed to Ethereum through OP Stack dispute games: Boundless Kailua zero-knowledge fault proofs became the game used for withdrawals in early July 2026, but on 7 September 2026 withdrawals were switched back to a permissioned game that L2BEAT reports cannot resolve disputes for Ronin. RON pays gas; block production uses no stake or work of its own. 23489132223
Design
- System
- Layer 2 blockchainRonin mainnet (chain ID 2020) ran its own validator set as an Ethereum sidechain until a hard fork at block 55,577,490 on 12 May 2026, when it migrated in place to an Ethereum Layer 2 built on the OP Stack, keeping its state, history and RON as the gas token. Transaction data goes to EigenDA with only commitments on Ethereum, so L2BEAT classes Ronin as an optimium and lists it outside its rollup categories because the proof system is not fully functional and there is no data-availability bridge. Pages that still call Ronin a Layer 1 are out of date.
- Settles to
- EthereumState roots, data commitments and the OP Stack bridge contracts live on Ethereum, while transaction data lives on EigenDA. Ronin's docs say blocks take about 12 minutes to finalize on Ethereum. L2BEAT reports that withdrawals through the OP Stack bridge wait at least a 3.5-day challenge period and 7 days after proving, but that bridge holds no user funds; user assets move through Chainlink CCIP instead.
- Settlement family
- Ethereum / EVM
- Scarce resource
- Other
- State model
- Accounts
- Finality
- Other
- Who makes blocks
- One sequencer run by Conduit, per Ronin's node documentation. L2BEAT lists one permissioned proposer address, a Conduit 4-of-11 multisig allowed to challenge or delete proposed state roots, and a 5-of-6 joint Ronin and Conduit multisig that can upgrade the Ethereum contracts with no delay. That joint multisig also holds the Guardian role, which can pause withdrawals and choose which dispute game withdrawals respect. Users can force transactions in through Ethereum with up to a 12-hour delay.
- Fork choice
- No open fork choice on the Layer 2: the canonical chain is derived from batch data on EigenDA referenced by commitments on Ethereum, and state roots settle through dispute-game contracts on Ethereum. L2BEAT notes that the data commitments are not checked against EigenDA on Ethereum, so the sequencer alone could post a commitment to unavailable data.
Qualifications
- Scarce resource · Not applicable. Since May 2026 block production uses no stake or work of its own: the sequencer is operator-assigned. RON staking ended at the migration, and emissions now go to builders through Proof of Distribution, which is a reward program, not consensus.
- Finality · Partial. Staged confidence: about 250 ms sequencer preconfirmations that can still be reorganized, about 2-second Layer 2 blocks, and about 12 minutes to finality on Ethereum per Ronin's docs. Withdrawal settlement depends on the proof system, which since 7 September 2026 relies on a permissioned proposer.
- Ethereum security inheritance · Contested. Ronin says the chain now inherits Ethereum's security. L2BEAT reports data stored on EigenDA without an on-chain availability check, a proof system that cannot currently resolve disputes, and instantly upgradable contracts.
- Data availability · Partial. Only data commitments are posted to Ethereum; the transaction data itself is held by EigenDA operators.
- Pre migration history · Partial. Blocks before 12 May 2026 were produced by Ronin's former validator set (22 block producers under delegated proof of stake with about 6-second finality from October 2023) under different security assumptions.
Tradeoffs
- Emphasizes
- Scalability Contested
- Gives up
- Decentralization and trust-minimized security: one operator sequences every transaction, only a permissioned proposer can post state roots, transaction data sits on EigenDA without an on-chain availability check, contracts can be upgraded instantly by a joint Ronin and Conduit multisig, and the validator staking that used to secure the chain was retired at the migration.Ronin's announcements say the chain now inherits Ethereum's security. L2BEAT's assessment (not even Stage 0, critical risks from the proof system, data availability and instant upgrades) contradicts that for now, so security is not listed as an emphasis. Ronin says it will eventually use zero-knowledge fraud proofs through Boundless Kailua. Because Ronin's own docs and posts describe the chain as inheriting Ethereum's security, this reading is marked contested.
- Full node at home
- Demanding 32425Ronin's docs say there is no longer a separate Ronin node binary and point node operators to Conduit's Ronin repository (op-reth, op-node and an EigenDA proxy); that repository is now archived and redirects to Conduit's generic node repository. Conduit's archived Ronin guide lists 2 CPUs, 120 GiB memory and 800 GiB disk for mainnet; its current generic guide lists 4 to 8+ cores, 16 to 32 GB RAM and 500 GB to 1 TB+ NVMe, runs op-reth as an archive node, and restores snapshots from a requester-pays cloud bucket. A node also needs an Ethereum execution RPC and beacon endpoint.
- Throughput claims
- Theoretical peak: 1,000,000 tx/s 11Theoretical peak; not comparable across chains or with observed load.Stated in a September 2025 Ronin blog post as a benefit expected from adopting the OP Stack, before the migration.Not comparable: stated with no methodology, hardware, bandwidth or test setup published alongside it. Ignores propagation, state growth, data-availability cost and the single sequencer; not comparable with any other chain's figure. The same post promised 100 to 200 ms block times, while current docs describe about 2-second blocks with about 250 ms preconfirmations. Home-node incompatibility is an inference from the published node resource specifications, not a measured result.
- Observed window: 1.54 22Observed in the stated window only; not capacity.User operations per second as counted by L2BEAT (UOPS), not raw transactions.Past-day figure displayed on L2BEAT's Ronin page when retrieved on 2026-09-27.Measures demand during one day, not capacity. A third-party count that changes daily; re-check before quoting.
Scaling layers
No scaling layer recorded in this profile.
Capabilities
| Capability | How it is provided | Notes and sources |
|---|---|---|
| Account abstraction | Structured assessment pending | Not yet assessed for any chain. |
| Atomic swaps | Unknown | A protocol-level trust-minimized swap mechanism on Ronin was not reviewed; EVM contracts could implement one but none was verified. |
| Authenticated data publication | Unknown | Not yet assessed under this row's current definition. |
| Light clients | Unknown | A light-client verification path for Ronin was not reviewed. |
| Native staking or delegation | Structured assessment pending | Not yet assessed for any chain. |
| On-chain governance | Structured assessment pending | Not yet assessed for any chain. |
| Parallel execution | Structured assessment pending | Not yet assessed for any chain. |
| Payment or state channels | Unknown | No payment or state channel layer anchored to Ronin was reviewed. |
| Programmable spending | Native (protocol or core-team software) Earlier definition | Ronin runs EVM smart contracts, so spend conditions are contracts. A January 2025 Ronin support article describes the transition from a permissioned network to one where developers can deploy applications without prior approval. 51922 |
| Protocol-verified messaging | Structured assessment pending | Not yet assessed for any chain. |
| Reversible transfers or recovery | Unknown | Not yet assessed under this row's current definition. |
| Rollups | Unknown | Absence was not verified, so the rule that absence needs a source makes this cell unknown. Earlier finding: Ronin announced in June 2024 that builders could launch zero-knowledge chains on top of Ronin with Polygon's development kit, and in August 2025 said those plans would be re-evaluated; no live rollup anchored to Ronin was found. Ronin itself is an Ethereum Layer 2. 1015 |
| Shielded transfers | Structured assessment pending | Not yet assessed for any chain. |
| Signed partial offers | Unknown | Not yet assessed under this row's current definition. |
Reading these values
- How this feature is provided
- Built into the protocol, core-team software or independent software says where a feature lives and who can change it. These are implementation layers, not quality: core-team software is not closer to the protocol than independent software.
- Structured assessment pending
- The shared review has not assessed this feature for any chain yet (Account abstraction, Native staking or delegation, On-chain governance, Parallel execution, Protocol-verified messaging and Shielded transfers). That does not mean it is absent, and a chain’s profile may already describe it.
- Unknown
- The review has not established this for this chain under the current definition; the note beside it says why. Unknown is not absent and not a low score. A feature reads “Not present” only when a source shows it is absent.
- Earlier definition
- Payment or state channels, Programmable spending and Rollups keep the earlier definition until the next fact-check. There, “Native” does not separate the protocol from core-team software, “Ecosystem software” does not say who publishes it, and “Partial” does not say which layer.
- Reading across rows
- The list of capabilities is incomplete. Do not read these rows as a chain leading or lagging overall.
Ecosystem & custody
| Product type | Status | Notes and sources |
|---|---|---|
| Automated market makers | First-partyKatana | Ronin's docs describe Katana as a decentralized exchange for trading tokens within the Ronin ecosystem: an automated market maker with V2 pools and V3 concentrated-liquidity pools, reached through the Ronin app. Ronin said the migration did not affect Katana pools, and its September 2026 governance proposal concerns Katana RON pools. Liquidity depth was not measured and other venues were not reviewed. 6812 |
| Issuer-native stablecoins | ThinPHPC (Coins.ph) | Ronin reports that Coins.ph launched PHPC, a Philippine peso stablecoin, on Ronin in July 2024. Coins.ph's own PHPC whitepaper names itself as issuer, says PHPC will also be issued on Ronin, and labels PHPC as operating under the Philippine central bank's regulatory sandbox, with holders reimbursed when that period ends. Current PHPC circulation on Ronin was not measured. Circle's USDC address list and Tether's supported-protocol list do not include Ronin, so USDC on Ronin is a representation bridged through Chainlink CCIP, not issuer-native. 161718272832 |
| Algorithmic stablecoins | Unknown | Algorithmic or hybrid stablecoins on Ronin were not reviewed. |
| Bridges | First-partyRonin Bridge app (Chainlink CCIP), OP Stack standard bridge contracts, Legacy Ronin Bridge (deprecated) | Ronin's validators chose Chainlink CCIP as the canonical bridge in 2024 and moved all legacy bridge funds to it in April 2025. Chainlink's directory lists Ronin lanes to Ethereum and Base. The May 2026 migration deployed the OP Stack bridge, but L2BEAT reports it holds no user funds. Third-party bridges were not reviewed. Risk: CCIP transfers depend on Chainlink's oracle networks, its risk management network and token-pool rate limits, not on Ethereum's dispute games. The legacy gateway still holds residual balances released by a stake-weighted operator multisig, and some Ronin bridge docs still describe that older design. The OP Stack bridge contracts can be upgraded with no delay. 7162226 |
| Block explorers | First-partyRonin Explorer (explorer.roninchain.com, Blockscout-based), Blockscout (ronin.blockscout.com) | Ronin's May 2026 post introduced a new explorer at explorer.roninchain.com, which runs Blockscout, and said the legacy explorer in the Ronin app was retired; some Ronin docs pages still link the old address. Explorer indexes are not canonical consensus. 82930 |
| Hardware wallets | ThinLedger through Ronin Wallet, Trezor through MetaMask, Rabby or Ronin Wallet | See custody rows: Trezor's Ronin page names only third-party wallet apps, and no Ledger page naming Ronin was found; both devices sign through third-party or Ronin wallet software, the Ledger with its Ethereum app. 202131 |
Hardware-wallet custody
| Device maker | Status | What users can and cannot do |
|---|---|---|
| Ledger | Through an intermediaryRonin Wallet browser extension or mobile app, signing with Ledger's Ethereum appSame as native: Unknown | Can: Import a Ledger account into Ronin Wallet and approve Ronin transactions on the device with Ledger's Ethereum app open Cannot: Manage Ronin accounts in Ledger's own app, as far as this review found Cannot: Use the Ledger with the Ronin Wallet extension in Firefox, per Ronin's support articleLedger's Ronin coin page returned 404 and no Ledger page naming Ronin was found. Ronin's support article dates from August 2024, before the Layer 2 migration; that the same flow still works was not re-tested. 20 |
| Trezor | Through an intermediaryMetaMask or Rabby (named on Trezor's Ronin page) or the Ronin Wallet extension (named by Ronin support)Same as native: Unknown | Can: Hold and send RON on the Ronin network with a Trezor Safe 3, 5 or 7 connected to MetaMask or Rabby Can: Import a Trezor account into the Ronin Wallet extension Cannot: Manage Ronin in Trezor's own Suite app; Trezor's page names only third-party wallet appsTrezor's Ronin page still describes RON as a token that will eventually pay gas and secure the network, so its text predates current Ronin; transactions are still approved on the device, but parity with assets that Trezor Suite supports directly was not assessed. 2131 |
Public data
iKnow Blockchain has no public-data lookups for Ronin yet. This is a limit of the service, not a statement about the network.
| Lookup | Status | What it covers and its limits |
|---|---|---|
| Address or account | Not available yet | Public-data lookups for this chain are not built yet. |
| Tokens and assets | Not available yet | Public-data lookups for this chain are not built yet. |
| NFTs | Not available yet | Public-data lookups for this chain are not built yet. |
| Transactions | Not available yet | Public-data lookups for this chain are not built yet. |
Sourced developments
Developments: Review overdue Reviewed Sep 27, 2026; next review was due Oct 7, 2026, 12:00 UTC.
Publication date · newest first
-
Ronin announced RON-holder governance and its first proposal
Ronin announced a governance framework in which RON holders vote on economic and treasury matters, with RGP-1, a proposal to deploy treasury assets as Katana liquidity for RON pairs, expected to start in October 2026. It also scheduled a first transfer of 16,234,252 RON from former staking rewards to the treasury in October.
- Proposal:announced; vote expected October 2026
- Implementation:not started
- Release:not released
- Activation:not active as of this review
-
Ronin withdrawals switched back from Kailua ZK proofs to a permissioned game
An Ethereum transaction on 7 September 2026 set Ronin's withdrawal contracts back to the permissioned dispute game, about two months after Boundless Kailua zero-knowledge proofs were enabled in early July 2026 (L2BEAT links a transaction dated 1 July). L2BEAT reports that the permissioned game's proof program cannot execute Ronin's state, so security now rests on the permissioned proposer.
- Implementation:executed on Ethereum
- Release:mainnet contracts
- Activation:permissioned game active since 2026-09-07; reason not published in reviewed sources
Sources: Etherscan — Ethereum transaction switching Ronin withdrawals to the permissioned game (external site) · Etherscan — Ethereum transaction enabling Kailua proofs for Ronin (external site) · L2BEAT — Ronin (external site)
-
Ronin mainnet became an Ethereum Layer 2 on the OP Stack
After a planned outage of about 10 hours on 12 May 2026, Ronin mainnet resumed as an OP Stack Layer 2 run by Conduit, with data on EigenDA and RON kept as gas. Validator staking ended, emissions fell to 5 million RON a year for builders, and a new explorer replaced the old one.
- Proposal:OP Stack adoption voted by governing validators in 2025
- Implementation:Completed
- Release:Mainnet
- Activation:active since 12 May 2026
Sources: Ronin blog — Ronin is Home. (external site) · Ronin blog — Ronin is coming home to Ethereum (external site) · Ronin blog — Powering Ronin's Homecoming to Ethereum (external site) · L2BEAT — Ronin (external site)
-
Ronin's Saigon testnet completed its move to the OP Stack
Ronin announced that its Saigon testnet had migrated to an OP Stack Layer 2 with Optimism and Conduit, as a rehearsal for mainnet, and told node operators to switch to reth and op-node.
- Proposal:OP Stack adoption voted by governing validators in 2025
- Implementation:completed on testnet
- Release:testnet only
- Activation:active on Saigon testnet
Sources: Ronin blog — The Saigon Testnet Migration is Complete (external site) · Ronin blog — Powering Ronin's Homecoming to Ethereum (external site)
Topics your AI can explain
Your AI can explain these topics for Ronin through the connection, with sources.
Known gaps
What this profile's review did not establish:
- Ronin has not published an explanation, found in this review, for the 7 September 2026 switch of withdrawals back to the permissioned dispute game, or a date for re-enabling zero-knowledge fault proofs.
- Who controls the joint Ronin and Conduit upgrade multisig, and how the September 2026 statement that protocol decisions remain under validator governance maps to those keys, was not established.
- The legal and corporate operator arrangement between Sky Mavis and Conduit for the sequencer was not sourced beyond Ronin's statement that Conduit operates the Layer 2 infrastructure.
- L2BEAT notes that Ronin's Superchain configuration contract is a local fork rather than the shared Optimism Superchain contract; whether Ronin is otherwise a member of the Optimism Superchain was not confirmed.
- The current fee formula (execution fee, any Ethereum data component, minimum gas price) after the migration is not documented in the reviewed Ronin docs; the EIP-1559 page describes the earlier validator chain.
- Current full-node disk size and bandwidth needs were not measured; the node posture relies on Conduit's published resource specifications.
- Ledger support was not verified on a Ledger page (Ronin coin page 404; the supported-asset list did not render); the Ledger and Trezor flows come from Ronin support articles written before the migration.
- Coins.ph's whitepaper confirms PHPC issuance on Ronin under the central bank's sandbox, but whether the sandbox period is still running and how much PHPC circulates on Ronin today were not confirmed.
- Ronin's bridge history, including past security incidents, was not re-sourced in this review.
- Trust-minimized swaps, reversible-transfer or account-recovery features, light-client verification, channels and algorithmic stablecoins on Ronin were not reviewed.
- Some Ronin docs pages (tokenomics, Ronin Bridge, explorer link) still describe the pre-migration chain and conflict with the May 2026 announcements.
Sources
Oldest dated source check: Source checked Sep 27, 2026 Next check due Oct 27, 2026.
- Introduction to Ronin (external site)
- Network information (external site)
- Run a node (external site)
- Flashblocks (external site)
- Smart contract guidelines (external site)
- Katana (external site)
- CCIP Bridge (external site)
- Ronin is Home. (external site)
- Ronin is coming home to Ethereum (external site)
- Ronin's Homecoming to Ethereum (external site)
- Powering Ronin's Homecoming to Ethereum (external site)
- Ronin Governance (external site)
- Decentralization on Ronin (external site)
- Introducing Fast Finality on Ronin (external site)
- Introducing Ronin zkEVM (external site)
- The Ronin Bridge Chainlink CCIP migration is complete (external site)
- PHPC is live on Ronin (external site)
- Ronin and QRPH join forces (external site)
- Understanding the Differences Between Permissioned and Permissionless Networks (external site)
- Setting Up Your Ledger Wallet (external site)
- Setting Up Your Trezor Wallet (external site)
- Ronin (external site)
- Ethereum transaction switching Ronin withdrawals to the permissioned dispute game (external site)
- conduitxyz/ronin-migration-reth-docker (archived) (external site)
- conduitxyz/conduit-optimism-external-node (external site)
- Ronin CCIP Network - Mainnet Cross-Chain Configuration (external site)
- USDC contract addresses (external site)
- Supported protocols (external site)
- Ronin Mainnet blockchain explorer (external site)
- Ronin blockchain explorer (external site)
- Ronin wallet (external site)
- PHPC Whitepaper (external site)
Report an error
Found something wrong or out of date? Reporting is free, and every chain goes through the same process. Published corrections appear in the public log.
Funding disclosure
Funding disclosures appear here when an upkeep arrangement exists, in the form “Upkeep funded by [name]; verdicts unaffected.” The funder ledger has not been published yet. Neutrality & funding